Schunk Administration / Fiscal Blueprint

Balance the budget.
Rebuild the nation's finances.

A complete, testable starting framework for closing federal deficits, stabilizing borrowing, strengthening the economy and bringing the national debt down relative to the country's ability to pay.

November 5, 2026 · Policy analysis · Official data + illustrative scenarios
The mission

Two goals. Two different measures.

01

Stop the annual deficit

Bring annual federal receipts and spending into balance on a sustainable basis. Without that step, national debt normally continues growing.

02

Reverse the debt-to-GDP trend

Reduce debt held by the public relative to economic output, including through consistent fiscal discipline and durable growth rather than artificially inflated revenue assumptions.

03

Begin nominal debt repayment

After balancing the budget, produce actual sustained surpluses if lawmakers choose to retire outstanding debt in dollars. Paying every Treasury security to zero is neither the first objective nor a prerequisite for fiscal sustainability.

What “getting out of debt” really means

The federal government is not a household. Treasury securities serve financial markets and savers; gross federal debt also includes government-account holdings. The responsible near-term target is to stop the debt burden from outgrowing the economy. Eliminating all $40 trillion-plus of gross debt would require many decades of large surpluses and would fundamentally change Treasury markets and government trust-fund accounting.

01 / The evidence

America's actual financial position

Every figure below is dated. Figures marked “actual” are government-reported observations; CBO figures are forecasts, and the interactive plan later in this report is a hypothetical scenario, not a government score.

FY2026 Federal Receipts$5.403TTreasury actual; fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2026
FY2026 Federal Outlays$7.396TTreasury actual; fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2026
FY2026 Net Interest$1.052T14.2% of FY2026 federal outlays
Gross Federal Debt$40.547TTreasury report Nov. 3, 2026; latest stored snapshot loads automatically

Where federal money came from

Treasury / Congressional JEC fiscal year 2026. Figures rounded to billions.
Receipt sourceFY2026Share
Individual income taxes$2,846B52.7%
Social insurance and retirement taxes$1,812B33.5%
Corporate income taxes$381B7.1%
Customs duties$173B3.2%
Other receipts$191B3.5%
Total receipts$5,403B100%

Where the federal money went

Treasury / Congressional JEC FY2026 functional groupings, rounded.
Spending categoryFY2026Share
Social Security$1,667B22.5%
Income security and veterans benefits$1,110B15.0%
Medicare$1,073B14.5%
Net interest on debt$1,052B14.2%
Defense$917B12.4%
Medicaid$723B9.8%
Foreign aid$32B0.4%
Other outlays$822B11.1%
Total outlays$7,396B100%

Rounding creates small differences between summed categories and reported totals. These groupings are from the Congressional Joint Economic Committee's FY2026 Treasury-based table ↗ and are not interchangeable with all other CBO budget function classifications.

What the annual deficit means

The $1.992 trillion deficit means approximately 26.94% of FY2026 outlays were not covered by receipts. For every $1.00 collected, the government spent roughly $1.37. Subtracting the roughly $1.052 trillion net-interest bill leaves a primary deficit of about $941 billion before net interest.

That primary deficit is the annual gap excluding net interest. Reaching primary balance would help stabilize the debt dynamics, but it would not by itself eliminate the total deficit or the interest bill.

The debt stock

The site's November 3 Treasury snapshot recorded $40.547 trillion gross debt, with approximately $32.765 trillion held by the public and $7.782 trillion in intragovernmental holdings. The two debt components have different economic meanings.

For debt sustainability analysis, CBO generally emphasizes debt held by the public relative to GDP. For the official daily debt balance, consult the Treasury-powered debt dashboard.

02 / Economic constraints

Fiscal policy doesn't operate in a vacuum.

A balanced budget is not successful if it is achieved by undermining the economic base that finances the government. Inflation, employment, investment, demographic change and interest costs affect the revenue and spending path.

Real GDP · Q3 2026+3.4%BEA advance estimate, seasonally adjusted annual rate
Unemployment · Sept 20264.2%Bureau of Labor Statistics monthly survey
CPI · 12 months to Sept 2026+3.7%Consumer price index, all urban consumers
CBO debt held by public · 2036120%Percent of GDP in CBO's February 2026 baseline forecast

These are dated observations and a dated forecast, not a single synchronized economic snapshot. GDP growth of 3.4% was an annualized rate for one quarter, not the growth rate assumed in our multi-decade budget scenario. BEA ↗, BLS employment ↗ and BLS inflation ↗.

Three long-term pressures that cannot be ignored

2032

Social Security OASI

The 2026 trustees project the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust-fund reserves exhausted in Q4 2032, at which point continuing income would cover roughly 78% of scheduled benefits without legal changes.

2033

Medicare Hospital Insurance

The 2026 trustees project Hospital Insurance trust-fund reserve depletion in Q2 2033, with continuing income sufficient for approximately 89% of benefits then scheduled.

2036

Net interest pressure

CBO's February outlook projects net interest more than doubling, to roughly $2.1 trillion in FY2036. That is a baseline estimate, not a Treasury FY2036 actual.

Sources: Social Security and Medicare 2026 trustees summary ↗ and CBO 2026–2036 economic and budget outlook ↗. Any package must separately safeguard the actuarial financing of Social Security and Medicare; federal deficit reduction does not automatically solve trust-fund shortfalls.

03 / The scale of reform

Small cuts won't close a trillion-dollar gap.

Cutting every penny of the $32 billion foreign aid category in FY2026 would cover just 1.6% of that year's deficit, before considering policy consequences. Even a $100 billion annual cost reduction would cover only about 5.0% of FY2026's shortfall.

GAO's 2026 duplication review reports 610 open matters and recommendations, with potential future benefits exceeding $100 billion. The sum covers different proposals and time periods; it does not represent an immediately collectible annual $100 billion check. GAO also reported about $774.3 billion in cumulative benefits identified over 2011–2026, not FY2026 savings.

Similarly, the IRS projected a $606 billion net tax gap for tax year 2022, after accounting for enforcement and late collections. It is a historical estimate of unpaid taxes, not a guaranteed or fully recoverable new revenue source.

The real 2036 challenge

CBO's February 2026 current-law forecast puts the annual deficit near $3.1 trillion in FY2036, or 6.7% of GDP. Even if 2026's budget were suddenly balanced, existing laws, demographic pressures and interest costs could reopen the gap. A durable solution must bend the future trend.

Useful references: GAO's 2026 report ↗ · IRS tax gap ↗ · CBO outlook ↗.

04 / The proposed framework

Build a credible package, not a single miracle fix.

One illustrative route to FY2036 balance would improve revenue by 3.3 percentage points of GDP, reduce primary program outlays by 3.1 points, and obtain 0.3 points in lower net interest from smaller borrowing needs. That is a total improvement of 6.7% of GDP—matching the size of CBO's baseline FY2036 deficit. At an implied FY2036 GDP of about $46.3 trillion, the relief would total approximately $3.1 trillion in that year.

Critical honesty about the estimates

These numbers are policy targets invented for transparent scenario analysis, not official scores, enacted legislation or expected savings. No independent analyst has certified that these policies would collectively achieve them. Several categories can overlap; meaningful scoring, incidence analysis, economic feedback and legislative negotiations could lower the gains substantially. The debt-service benefit is conditional, not guaranteed.

Revenue measures3.3% GDPIllustrative FY2036 target · approximately $1.53T
Primary spending measures3.1% GDPIllustrative FY2036 target · approximately $1.43T
Potential interest feedback0.3% GDPConditional FY2036 target · approximately $139B
Total target relief6.7% GDPMatches $3.1T CBO FY2036 baseline deficit

Evidence-based options lawmakers could examine

The nonpartisan CBO publishes costed options, without endorsing them. Its December 2024 report includes different versions of a 5% value-added tax estimated at $2.18–$3.38 trillion over 2025–2034; expanding Social Security taxable earnings with options estimating $728 billion–$1.427 trillion over ten years; and modifying Medicare Advantage benchmarks with an estimated $489 billion over ten years. A broader defense budget reduction option was estimated at $959 billion over the earlier ten-year window.

These are historical CBO policy-option estimates for specific designs and an older budget baseline, not predictions for FY2036. They cannot be summed mechanically: proposals overlap, their fiscal effects change under later law and demographic conditions, and some increase costs or introduce other policy risks. A viable package needs new CBO and Joint Committee on Taxation scoring. Browse CBO's official budget options ↗.

05 / Interactive policy laboratory

Build your own balanced federal budget.

Adjust illustrative policy targets in percentage points of FY2036 GDP. The calculator converts them to dollars, tests them against CBO's $3.1 trillion FY2036 deficit baseline, and shows an example debt path. This is a transparent arithmetic model, not a dynamic macroeconomic forecast, official CBO score, or guarantee of enactment.

Policy Lab / FY2036 target

Choose the mix.

Use a preset or adjust any lever. More ambitious values require larger statutory, economic and distributional changes.

Revenue measures

1.00% GDPCBO has modeled VAT options; requires new legislation and protections for low-income households.
0.85% GDPLimit selected deductions and exclusions; define distributional impacts rather than assuming all preferences are waste.
0.55% GDPRevise statutory and base rules, coordinate international provisions and account for investment effects.
0.40% GDPChanges to the payroll tax base must be tied to Social Security actuarial solvency and legislative review.
0.30% GDPConsider realization responses and estate-planning effects; protect against double counting with other tax measures.
0.20% GDPThe IRS tax gap is not automatically collectible; subtract enforcement and administrative costs.

Spending and debt service

1.00% GDPMedicare Advantage risk adjustment, site-neutral payments, drug purchasing and value-based reforms require independent scoring.
0.60% GDPProspective changes only, protection for low-income or near-retirement beneficiaries, 75-year actuarial review.
0.40% GDPReduce procurement failure and duplication without assuming national-security needs vanish.
0.45% GDPReview agencies, buildings, grants and service programs; measure service loss before booking savings.
0.40% GDPProgram integrity, eligibility and subsidy design require statutory changes and protection for vulnerable recipients.
0.25% GDPVerified net savings only; avoid counting the same GAO, procurement or healthcare changes twice.
0.30% GDPConditional assumption, not an independent scored policy; depends on debt and market-rate paths.
Illustrative annual FY2036 result
Calculating...

Calculating model...

Revenue gains3.30%of GDP
Primary spending3.10%of GDP
Interest feedback0.30%of GDP (conditional)
Annual relief$3.10T6.70% of GDP
RevenueProgram spendingPossible interest feedback
Illustrative cumulative 2027–36 relief—Assuming policy effects ramp up evenly over 10 years
Illustrative public debt · 2036—CBO 2036 baseline debt less simulated accumulated relief
Debt / GDP · 2036—Illustrative; official CBO baseline is 120%
Debt / GDP · 2050—Unscored extension using 3.5% nominal GDP growth

Year-by-year transition

The annual baseline below interpolates between Treasury's observed FY2026 deficit and CBO's FY2036 forecast. It is not CBO's published year-by-year baseline. Policy effects rise by 10% of their full modeled level per year, beginning in 2027.

Illustrative annual amounts, nominal dollars (trillions); not officially scored
Fiscal yearBaseline deficitPolicy reliefRemaining result
Calculating trajectory…

What would it take to pay off outstanding publicly held debt?

Budget balance can stabilize borrowing without making nominal debt disappear. Select a sustained annual federal surplus after interest starting after FY2036. This payoff illustration uses modeled FY2036 debt and a constant nominal surplus, and ignores subsequent economic, interest and financing changes.

$1.00T per year

Calculating… · —. This concerns publicly held debt, not automatic cancellation of intragovernmental trust-fund obligations.

The 2050 ratio uses a simplifying growth assumption, not a CBO forecast.

No numbers are transmitted to a server by this calculator. Inputs are local to your browser and reset on reload. The model omits induced changes in growth, inflation, interest rates, taxpayer behavior, program utilization and legislation. Its interest-feedback lever is not automatically generated from the debt path.

06 / The policy program

Exactly where the fiscal work would happen.

A durable package must be detailed enough for Congress, CBO, agencies, independent auditors and the public to examine. The following domains identify the action, decision-maker, evidence and tradeoff. All percentages are proposed FY2036 GDP targets, not independently scored savings.

A. Build an enduring revenue system

Consumption tax with rebates — illustrative target 1.00% GDP. Congress could examine a modest federal value-added tax, with refundable rebates or tax credits to protect lower-income households. Specify the base, exemptions, administrative costs, and state-tax interaction. Some versions would be regressive without offsets. CBO has analyzed VAT alternatives, but none is assumed enacted here.

Income tax and tax expenditures — 0.85% GDP. Review itemized deductions, exclusions, preferential treatment and higher-income tax provisions. Preserve transparent family and charitable policy goals where appropriate. Require Treasury and JCT distribution tables by income level. A preference's theoretical budget cost is not necessarily its repeal yield.

Corporate and international rules — 0.55% GDP. Compare corporate-rate changes, base broadening, loss rules, international income, and anti-avoidance provisions. Account for investment, profit shifting and compliance. Higher statutory rates do not translate mechanically into the same revenue gain.

Payroll solvency — 0.40% GDP. Consider earnings-cap reforms and other dedicated financing, while maintaining actuarial transparency and evaluating effects on labor incentives. Social Security's legally separate trust funds need direct analysis; general-fund accounting cannot replace their solvency work.

Investment and estates — 0.30% GDP. Evaluate capital-gains realization and deferral rules, basis rules and estate-tax design, with small-business and liquidity considerations. These options overlap with other income-tax provisions and need integrated scoring.

Enforcement and compliance — 0.20% GDP. Invest in validated compliance modernization, secure data matching, clearer filing and effective oversight. The FY2022 projected $606B net tax gap is a scale reference, not a recoverable balance or a current-year revenue estimate.

B. Control spending without breaking services

Medicare and health payment policy — 1.00% GDP. Examine site-neutral provider payments, Medicare Advantage risk adjustment, prescription procurement, fraud prevention and payment reform. Measure patient outcomes, rural access, provider participation and any shifting of costs to households or states. CMS and CBO would need to score specific proposals.

Retirement-program sustainability — 0.60% GDP. Gradually evaluate full retirement age, benefit formula progressivity, affluent beneficiary treatment and financing. Protect current retirees and near-retirees in the scenario. Separate Social Security actuarial solvency from general budget deficit effects; these are not identical.

Defense and acquisition — 0.40% GDP. Review force structure, duplicative weapons programs, lifecycle sustainment, contract overruns, military health procurement and infrastructure. Do not assume that an arbitrary percentage cut produces the same reduction without readiness consequences.

Other discretionary programs — 0.45% GDP. Identify obsolete administrative work, overlapping grants, unused facilities and low-value projects. Preserve legally required services and audit accessibility, processing delays, grants and workforce impacts.

Other mandatory programs — 0.40% GDP. Consider eligibility design, subsidy targeting and better interagency coordination. Major changes to veterans, disability or low-income supports require public scrutiny, explicit safeguards and often congressional legislation.

Contracts and improper payments — 0.25% GDP. Establish procurement scorecards and pursue documented GAO recommendations, independent payment verification and license consolidation. Only budget reductions supported by actual implementation and evidence should count; do not add estimated contract, fraud and healthcare savings twice.

Debt-service feedback — 0.30% GDP. Under lower borrowing needs, net interest may eventually be below the baseline. The modeled amount requires its own Treasury and CBO debt-service simulation and may be smaller, later, or absent if rates or borrowing conditions change.

C. What we would not pretend

  • We would not claim the executive branch alone can levy taxes, rewrite Social Security benefits, or cancel appropriations by executive order.
  • We would not treat all federal grants, foreign aid or discretionary spending as discretionary cash that can be instantly recovered.
  • We would not book every dollar identified in a GAO report, projected tax gap or potential vendor consolidation as annual revenue.
  • We would not equate slower spending growth with a reduction in a program's nominal outlays, or omit healthcare, employment and security impacts.
  • We would not guarantee full budget balance from policy goals without independent scoring.
07 / Execution

A ten-year legislative and operational roadmap

First 100 days

Publish an honest baseline

Establish a joint executive and congressional fiscal review framework, ask CBO and JCT to score candidate packages, require agencies to identify GAO and inspector-general findings, and publish an annual public-facing finance ledger. List proposals separately from enacted laws.

Owner: OMB, Treasury, CBO/JCT for independent scoring, congressional budget committees. Deliverable: reproducible baseline, agency risk inventory, and legislation timetable.

2027–2028

Enact revenue and program changes

Legislate a phased package with implementation dates, consumer protection, service-continuity plans and sunset or review provisions. Update Social Security and Medicare financing on their own actuarial tracks. Congress must enact taxes, appropriations and major benefit changes.

Deliverable: independently scored fiscal package, distributional analysis, agency implementation plans and transparent performance measures.

2029–2031

Measure results and correct course

Publish annual realized savings versus estimates, new revenues versus forecasts, service-quality measures and debt-service developments. Adjust programs if access or economic outcomes worsen. Do not count merely “announced” savings.

Deliverable: annually reconciled scorecard, CBO re-estimates, GAO audits and public correction log.

2032–2036

Address trust-fund deadlines and reach a balanced path

Trustees' 2032–2033 depletion dates demand action earlier than 2036. If legislation and performance match the illustrative package, the annual federal deficit could close around FY2036 in this model. If not, publish the shortfall and additional tradeoffs instead of claiming success.

Deliverable: full fiscal balance under official scoring, actuarial solvency updates and debt-to-GDP stabilization.

2037–2050+

Hold the gains and retire debt if appropriate

A balanced budget can reduce the debt burden relative to a growing economy even without absolute debt reduction. Sustained surpluses after interest can reduce publicly held debt in nominal dollars. Congress should set a sustainable debt target that preserves liquidity, national-security capabilities and economic stability.

Deliverable: a transparent debt rule, annual independent reviews and renewed multi-year projections—not an arbitrary promise that the national debt reaches zero by a given election.

08 / Measuring success

How we know whether the plan is working.

01

Primary deficit

Track receipts minus noninterest outlays. Target a sustainable primary balance early, while publishing exact dollar values and how much comes from genuine program change.

02

Total deficit or surplus

Track federal budget receipts less outlays including net interest. This is the actual test of annual balance, verified against Treasury and later budget reports.

03

Debt held by public / GDP

Track a clear multiyear path rather than daily headlines. The scenario calculator shows how a decade of policy relief could alter CBO's 2036 baseline, subject to major modeling limitations.

04

Social Security & Medicare financing

Publish trust-fund solvency projections separately; no claim of “budget solved” should conceal a deterioration in future benefits or financing.

05

Service and economic outcomes

Watch unemployment, inflation, real growth, poverty, health access and critical defense readiness. A fiscal target is not worth unmeasured harm to essential public services.

06

Verified implementation

Require signed legislation, actual collections, observed outlays and audit evidence. Track shortfalls and corrections publicly, with datasets that anyone can reproduce.

What our model can—and cannot—claim

Our simplified default scenario scales its FY2036 targets from 10% implementation in 2027 to 100% by 2036. It adds annual relief and subtracts that approximate cumulative amount from CBO's FY2036 public-debt baseline. The model's illustrative debt ratio falls below CBO's 120% baseline. If a balanced budget persisted and nominal GDP grew at the separately assumed 3.5% a year, the ratio would decline further by 2050.

None of those figures is a prediction. We have not rerun CBO's economic model. We use a stylized transition, do not model how higher taxes and lower spending alter economic output or interest rates, and do not reconcile every Treasury financing transaction. Actual policy interactions could invalidate the illustrative result. To turn a blueprint into a credible scored federal budget, Congress would need specific bill language and official cost estimates.

The most important conclusion

There is no honest path to eliminating more than $40 trillion in outstanding federal debt in a single presidential term. The defensible long-term target is to reverse the debt burden first, achieve sustained fiscal balance, secure major trust funds, and only then decide the appropriate pace of nominal debt reduction. The calculations reveal the scale of the choices—rather than promising cost-free solutions.

09 / Primary-source library

Every headline number should be traceable.

These links point to the government records used for the baseline, economic conditions, program solvency and prospective fiscal options. Sources are dated and should be rechecked before citing the numbers as current.

Method: Historical FY2026 flows are taken from the Treasury-derived October 2026 fiscal update. Debt stocks are based on Treasury's Debt to the Penny feed and may refresh in the visible card. The FY2036 fiscal gap and debt-to-GDP baseline are from CBO's February 2026 projections. The 2036 GDP used by the interactive calculator equals $3.1 trillion divided by 6.7%, approximately $46.27 trillion. Its 2026 GDP anchor approximates $7.4 trillion divided by 23.3%, and intervening GDP follows a constant growth rate for illustration. This is not a CBO year-by-year projection. The policy targets, ramp, post-2036 GDP growth and payoff examples are scenario assumptions, not official estimates or forecasts.

Published November 5, 2026. This analysis is part of an independent fictional-administration project and is not affiliated with the U.S. government. See editorial standards and corrections.

Federal Budget Simulator →Current Treasury Data →More Fiscal Research →